← Markets

Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal

Tennis Vol. $298,790 50 traders

J.J. Wolf100%
Mark Lajal0%
$298,790 Vol. Tennis

Outcomes

16
Chance
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Resolved
90% ▲ 50
Completed Match Resolved
90% ▲ 50
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set 2 Winner Resolved
90%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Match O/U 21.5 Resolved
1% ▼ 49
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set 1 Winner Resolved
90%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Total Sets: O/U 2.5 Resolved
1%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set 1 O/U 8.5 Resolved
90%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set 2 O/U 8.5 Resolved
1%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set Handicap +/-1.5 Resolved
90% ▲ 50
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Match O/U 22.5 Resolved
1%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set 2 O/U 9.5 Resolved
1%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set Handicap +/-1.5 Resolved
1%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set 1 O/U 9.5 Resolved
90%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set 2 O/U 10.5 Resolved
1%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Match O/U 23.5 Resolved
1%
Vancouver: J.J. Wolf vs Mark Lajal Set 1 O/U 10.5 Resolved
90%

Recent trades

  • No recent trades

This market refers to the tennis match between J.J. Wolf and Mark Lajal in the Vancouver, originally scheduled for August 2, 2026 at 5:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'J.J. Wolf' if J.J. Wolf advances against Mark Lajal. This market will resolve to 'Mark Lajal' if Mark Lajal advances against J.J. Wolf. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Comments